A clear advantage in hydrocracking


Obstacle

Things happen in the heating train. Extremely high skin temperatures can cause potentially dangerous side reactions and unexpected particle generation in the oil. And feed filters aren’t always going to solve the problem. Our customer was running three reactors in parallel trains on their hydrocracker unit, processing 60,000 BBL/day gas oil feed, with an additional 20,000 BBL/day feed recycled from the effluent fractionator. Even though they had installed 5-micron feed filters, they were seeing 1,000-micron particles in the bed, causing pressure drop and temperature excursion issues.

Path

In this case, the refiner wanted to run a comparison between our recommendation and the existing configuration. The first reactor was skimmed and reloaded with the original material. The second and third reactors were skimmed and loaded with six inches of CatTrap inert filtration.

​Pressure Drop Comparison of Three Reactors

Results

The graph above shows a comparison of all three reactors. In the two utilizing Crystaphase, the customer saw a longer cycle length, increased activity and throughput—not to mention a lower risk of temperature excursion. All three reactors are now running on Crystaphase.

“Since then, we’ve loaded Crystaphase in the top of the hydrocracker reactors in every cycle. No similar issue has been encountered.” – Hydroprocessing Specialist, Major Southeast Texas Refinery

Beat the heat. Get an analysis.

The shortest path to mitigating dangerous temperature excursion is a comprehensive system evaluation. Get yours.

Get your reactor analysis now.